Practice Test Questions for Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children® IV (WISC®-IV Test)
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV test), is an IQ test that is administered to children ages 6 and up. No writing or reading ability is needed of the child that is taking the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Once it has been completed, the WISC test produces an IQ score.
Like other IQ Tests, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children was designed to assess the child’s skills and abilities, rather than test for grade-level subject knowledge. The WISC-IV test is administered by a trained psychologist in a one-on-one setting with the child. The time it takes to complete the test varies because a good test proctor will usually establish a rapport with the child before they start asking questions from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Depending on the age of the child taking the WISC exam, it’s common for the test to take 2-3 hours and in some cases it takes more than one session.
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – WISC-IV test contains 16 subsets within the exam. Within each of these subtests the questions get more and more difficult as the child progresses through the sections. The format of the questions on the Wechsler Intelligence test are often subject to change. A child’s score is determined by how far they get within each subtest before getting three in a row wrong. Psychologists administering the test take the scores from the individual subtests and combine them to get the child’s IQ.
The 16 subtests of the the Wechsler Test:
- Block Design
- Digit Span
- Picture Concepts
- Letter-Number Sequencing
- Matrix Reasoning
- Symbol Search
- Picture Completion
- Word Reasoning
- Perceptual Reasoning Index
TestingMom.com provides the concepts covered Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and WISC test prep ideas you can use with your child.
Here are some practice questions for the WISC-IV test to ask your little one!
1. Do you see these 4 boxes? In the top row the pictures go together in a certain way. Now look at the bottom row. Do you see the empty box? Which of the 4 pictures on the side goes with the picture in the bottom box the same way the 2 pictures in the top row go together?
2. Three couples go out to lunch. They all ordered the same thing. Their total bill is $54.96. They planned to split it equally, but one couple owed one of the other couples lunch. How much did the couple that owed the other couple pay?
3. Do you see these 4 boxes? In the top row the pictures go together in a certain way. Now look at the bottom row. Do you see the empty box? Which of the 4 pictures on the side goes with the picture in the bottom box the same way the 2 pictures in the top row go together?
Answers: 1) 3rd picture over the bubble; 2) $36.64; 3) 4th picture over the bubble
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children® — Fourth Edition (WISC®-IV) is a registered trademark of Pearson Education, Inc or its affiliate(s), or their licensors. TestingMom.com is not affiliated with nor related to Pearson Education, Inc or its affiliates (“Pearson”). Pearson does not sponsor or endorse any TestingMom.com product, nor have TestingMom.com products or services been reviewed, certified, or approved by Pearson. Trademarks referring to specific test providers are used by TestingMom.com for nominative purposes only and such trademarks are solely the property of their respective owners.
21 Responses to “Practice Test Questions for Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children® IV (WISC®-IV Test)”
In the 1st question the picture on the right bottom is hard to define. Is that a pile of sweaters or a wallet?, and the correct answer is that a trunk of a coffin? Based on the answer I am to assume it is a pile of sweaters and a trunk, but I thought the sweaters was a wallet, so if I had been taking this test, (I am an adult) I would have chosen the purse. I really hope that the real test does not have difficult pictures to define, because in that case the test score may be inadequate, because of the difficult visible definition of the items. The milk and refrigerator was a more obvious sample. Also I was informed that this test averages about 5-6 hours of time for a child, so how can that big of a test be sampled with only 3 questions?
I apologize for adding to my message but most children have never used or seen a glass bottle of milk in the USA, and trunks are not all that commonly used anymore too. For the example of a record and a record player, paper and a typewriter these items are obsolete in a child’s mind. I also hope that these picture questions have been updated to use more current items that children of this time period understand.
would you send me the subtest, please?
Best I can tell on the newly released IPad Air with retina display, the fuzzy 4th block in question #1 appears to be a stack of pants or jeans. If the bottle of milk is stored in the refrigerator, would not the pants be stored in the trunk? More so, milk is removed from the refrigerator, pants are removed from the trunk. How does the purse factor in? Just curious?
Oh, i also picked the purse because i thought the sweaters were money. ( Using a macbook) And I thought the trunk was a pirate treasure chest. So……
And I picked the mailbox because I thought that’s a pile of mail!
I thought so called Intelligence tests were a thing of the past Two hours testing is a nightmare for a child. Responses to it from an 8yr old: I am not answering any more questions in case I get into trouble. Shame on the psychologists and schools for still using such out of date assessment strategies.
I agree with Autumn, as I had the same issue, caused by a blurry indeterminate picture. However, a quick interrogation of the questions shows that it is just a picture and not an interactive piece and therefore the resolution problem will not be presented to the kids. The picture will be clear, and they can clearly associate the clothes with a chest.
Autumn second question about obsolete items also carries some merit. However, you can be surprised at how much the children may know.
This is so crazy. I can’t believe these are the questions they give kids and then they are diagnosed with learning disabilities? So not fair. I feel bad for my students. I will never underestimate a child ever again. Just because they can’t perform on these stupid tests doesn’t mean they definitely are “learning disabled” or have a “speech /language impairment”
Hi Robert – you are correct. None of the materials on our web site are from the actual test. We would never, ever post actual questions from a test plus we’ve never seen the actual test. Our materials on Testing Mom provide guidance for the child to develop the underlying skills needed to be successful on tests like the WISC and WPPSI not to just memorize questions to repeat back on the test. That’s not what our program is about. Thanks for your comment!
Not only arn’t these sample items on the WISC, but they are poor substitutes. In any event, coaching a child for a test like this is what invalidates results because the results are premised on novelty. I would also say, as one who administers these tests, that they typically take approximately one hour, not two or three (only ten of the sixteen subtests are required). Bright children who answer more questions than is typical for their age may take twenty or thirty minutes longer. As for comments in this thread about what constitutes assessing for disability, suffice it to say that many factors go into this complex process, including extensive training. Results of the WISC, or an assessment like it are just one piece.
As a (training) school psychologist, this sample is more similar in difficulty to the adult version (WAIS). These tests may be tedious, but are not at all unpleasant for most children; many times they actually enjoy some of the subtests as they are presented more as “puzzles” than “tests.” Also, the student is not forced to sit through ANY psychometric test. From experience, they really shouldn’t go more than 2-3 hours, unless there is a scheduling conflict or other extenuating circumstance.
The test scores are not definitive, either. They are merely a tool to aid in diagnosis and decision making, they are not the ONLY factor that is very, very cautiously analyzed by highly trained professionals. I completely understand the concerns of those above, but I promise that this is not “torture” for the kids, and they are in good hands.
what I know that WISC-IV has 15 subtests not 16 … Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI) is within Indices of the WISC-IV which are VCI, PRI, WMI, and PSI.
I am a qualified Professional Counsellor (therapist) and have a 6 year old living in my home.
Judging from the example material supplied I have to say that putting a 6 year old through this ordeal would do more harm than good. Most kids, especially 6 year olds want to give you the answer they think you want. Often this leads to them guessing, or in some cases responding with “I don’t know” rather than giving the “wrong” answer.
Let kids be kids for heaven sake.
Seems like parents want things to be dumbed down for their kids.
This is an intelligence test ro test for above average students.
The picture was clearly a neatly folded stack of pants and a chest.
My 3rd grader answered the math question win his head.
Many children are required to take intelligence evaluation tests or gifted program qualification tests. These tests are usually intended to predict the child‘s ability to participate and cope with tasks that requires a high intelligence level. The tests pretend to be objective and provide a non-biased indication. However, studies have shown that this is not the case, and children who were prepared and practiced similar tests get significantly higher results. True, someone who is not intelligent will not be able to get high results even after huge amounts of training. Still, training allows gifted and intelligent children to realize their full ability and make the most of the stressful test situation.
Do the test takers know that they are being timed on the Processing Speed Index portion of the WISC?
My daughter had a great laugh reading the comments from parents.
If you enlarge the picture below the milk it will show that it is pants folded. My daughter did this several years ago through a Psychologist and her scores were mixed. Some areas were extremely high where other area’s were low. Upon that we determined where she needed assistance and where she didn’t.
In the first picture I too thought it was a stack of letters which would get associated with a mail box..In my country the mail boxes don’t even look like that.. my 5.8 yr old though picked the right one..he saw it as clothes and picked suitcase..he picked the right answer to third one too.. however he couldn’t do the math even when I asked him to split 60 three ways..his school does not start math until 1st grade ( 6+ yrs )
I am 12 years old and i knew what the pile of clothes were and the chest i just figured was a suitcase. It is rather simple.